Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01001A29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(a)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$132,598
→
Current$72,929reduced by $59,669
OSHA Inspection
Pacific Seafood — OSHA Inspection #344275235
WRANGELL, Alaska · NAICS 311712 · 68 workers on site
Inspection outcome
Opened: August 27, 2019 · Closed: March 5, 2020
○
Citations issued
OSHA issued one or more Other-than-serious citations.
Safety inspection · Planned (Programmed) · Partial — limited to specific operations or areas
Violations20
Serious+0
Initial penalty$261,590
Current penalty$140,001
Accidents0
Duration191d
Summary
What happened in this inspection
On August 27, 2019, OSHA opened Pacific Seafood’s inspection #344275235 at WRANGELL, Alaska. The case was administratively closed on March 5, 2020, 191 days after opening.
OSHA cited the employer for 20 violations totaling $140,001 in current penalties — reduced from an initial proposed total of $261,590. All citations were Other-than-serious.
Breakdown by classification
20violations total
Repeat630%
A Repeat violation means OSHA cited the employer for a substantially similar violation within the past 5 years. Penalties multiply (up to ~$165,000 per repeat citation) and indicate the employer failed to permanently abate a recurring hazard.
Serious735%
A Serious violation is one where there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew (or should have known) of the hazard. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. The majority of OSHA citations fall into this category.
Other-than-serious735%
An Other-than-serious violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. Often involves recordkeeping or procedural lapses.
Citations
Citations issued in this inspection
Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01001B29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(b)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01001C29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(c)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01001D29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01002A29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$72,952
→
Current$40,124reduced by $32,828
Repeatgravity 10
Citation #01002B29 CFR 1910.101(b)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0200129 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$10,419
→
Current$4,689reduced by $5,730
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #0200229 CFR 1910.28(b)(3)(iv)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$10,419
→
Current$5,730reduced by $4,689
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #02003A29 CFR 1910.37(a)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$10,419
→
Current$5,210reduced by $5,209
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #02003B29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #02005A29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$13,264
→
Current$6,631reduced by $6,633
Other
Citation #02004A29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$10,419
→
Current$4,688reduced by $5,731
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #02004B29 CFR 1910.219(b)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #02004C29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #02005B29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0300129 CFR 1910.157(e)(3)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0300229 CFR 1910.37(b)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$1,100
→
Current$0reduced by $1,100
Other
Citation #0300329 CFR 1910.25(b)(3)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0300429 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(b)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0300529 CFR 1910.29(k)(1)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Standard codes link to the regulation text on OSHA.gov. The text describes the rule itself; the specific findings of this inspection appear above. To see OSHA’s official record of this inspection, search activity number 344275235 at OSHA Establishment Search.
Same employer
Other OSHA inspections at Pacific Seafood
Earlier or related cases at this establishment.
Reference
About OSHA inspections
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducts inspections under several triggers: programmed targeting of high-hazard industries, employee complaints, workplace accidents, fatalities, and follow-ups to prior citations.
Citations
Each citation specifies a section of 29 CFR, a severity tier, and a proposed penalty. Employers can contest citations through OSHA’s informal conference or before the OSH Review Commission.
Open vs closed
An open case has not yet been administratively closed — citations may follow or the case may close without action.
Current vs initial penalty
Initial penalty is the proposed amount at citation. Current penalty is the post-conference / settlement figure on file today.
Trigger types
A = Accident, B = Complaint, H = Programmed, F = Follow-up. See the glossary for all codes.
About this inspection
OSHA classified this as Planned (Programmed) — a programmed (planned) inspection, typically targeting high-hazard industries.
Sources
Cross-check with OSHA directly
This page draws from the OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) via the DOL Open Data Portal. For the authoritative record, look up activity number 344275235 directly:
From the blog
Understand OSHA enforcement
Guides and analysis from our editorial team.
Data report
Industries With the Most OSHA Violations on Record (2026)
NAICS industries ranked by total OSHA citations and total inspections in the current enforcement window. Construction and specialty trades dominate both leaderboards.
Data report
The 15 U.S. Cities With the Most OSHA Inspections (2026)
A city-by-city ranking of U.S. metros with the highest OSHA inspection counts in the current enforcement window — what the city-level data reveals about regional safety enforcement.
Data report
OSHA Enforcement in 2026, By the Numbers: 426,000 Employers on Record
An overview of OSHA enforcement activity across 426,760 U.S. employers — 575,985 inspections, 24,000 violations, and $62,581,468 in penalties currently on file.
Data report
Seattle vs. Portland: OSHA Enforcement in Two Pacific Northwest Cities Compared
A side-by-side comparison of OSHA enforcement activity in Seattle and Portland — inspection counts, violations, penalties, and what the data reveals about workplace safety in each city.
Data report
The 10 U.S. Employers With the Largest OSHA Penalties on Record (2026)
A ranked list of the ten U.S. employers carrying the highest cumulative OSHA penalty assessments in the current enforcement window, with links to their full inspection histories.
Data report
The 10 Most-Inspected U.S. Employers in OSHA Records (2026)
Ten U.S. employers with the highest OSHA inspection counts across the current five-year enforcement window, ranked with links to each company's full record.
Data report
Top 10 Alabama Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Alabama employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.
Data report
Top 10 Alaska Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Alaska employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.
Data report
Top 10 Arizona Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Arizona employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.